|You can also read this at valaw2010.blogspot.com This shows Leah Lax et al - F'ing with the FBI - |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
JANICE WOLK GRENADIER
15 West Spring Street
Alexandria, Virginia 22301
v. Civil Action No. 14-162
ILIONA GRENADIER HECKMAN AMENDED VERIFYED COMPLAINT.
4200 Massachusetts Ave Apt 410
Washington DC 20016-4752
GRENADEIR ANDERSON STRARACE DUFFETT & KEISLER, PC
649 S. Washington Street
Alexandria, VA 22314
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Office of the Attorney General
900 East Main Street
Richmond, VA 23219
LAX MILLER –aka- LEAH LAX –aka-
MUGGY CAT –aka- BILLY SULLIVAN
Presidential Candidate for 2016
350 Market Street
Highspire, PA 17304
CAMPAIGN FOR LORETTA LAX MILLER
And all employees/volunteers
350 Market Street
Highspire, PA 17304
Jointly and Severally, in their Official and Personal Capacities.
AMENDED VERIFYED COMPLAINT
(for Applicable Relief and Jury Trial on all Counts)
COMES NOW Plaintiff Janice Wolk Grenadier (JWG) reserves the right to amend Complaint and add additional Parties per FRCP Rule 15. Plaintiff Janice Wolk Grenadier complains against the captioned Defendants to seek relief for the violation of Federal and Constitutional rights under Title 42 § 1983, and under the Bill of Rights the Four Basic Freedoms are being Violated:
Further Claims are outlined in this complaint.
1. This is an action for appropriate relief pursuant to the common law, statute and/or Constitution of the United States of America, for impermissible restraints upon the Plaintiff’s constitutionally protected property, entitlements and other Constitutional rights, in Violation of a person’s Civil Rights under 18 USC Sec 249 and the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Plaintiff will show statements made by Defendants are Slanderous, Libel and Defamation of Character of Plaintiff. The False statements that have been published as Fact and communicated through several e-mails will show defamation. That the statements have forever ruined the reputation of Plaintiff and her ability to promote a family friendly child product. The retaliation of Defendants to prevent the “TRUTH” coming out of IGH. That the Treason on the Courts by the Judge’s and the Judge’s they supervise were willful acts that were and are malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, and grossly reckless because the Plaintiff was Catholic.
2. That JWG was denied her constitutional right of Due Process in the courts of Virginia for being Catholic. That under Title 42 § 1983 will show violation of rights protected by the Constitution and created by Federal Statute that persons employed by the State of Virginia acting under color of state law violated Plaintiffs Constitutional rights. That two Chief Judges (Chief Justice The Honorable Cynthia D. Kinser and Hon. Lisa Bondareff Kemler, Presiding Judge, Chief Judge) who are or should be held responsible for the actions of the Judges beneath them in there subversion. That they are ultimately responsible for the actions in their courts and both are Jewish and have allowed Judges under their supervision to rule in Favoritism and Cronyism and for attorneys to be disingenuous in the documents that they filed in court, and under Judge’s order did not file documents entered into the record in the Plaintiff’s file in the Circuit Court of Alexandria. The new evidence under the Blog, jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com and the actual actions of the Judges shows the collusion and the discrimination against Plaintiff for being Catholic.
3. Plaintiff through Orders and documents filed in the clerk’s office the City of Alexandria and the Supreme Court of Virginia will show the pattern of this Hate and illegal Treason on the Courts and to Plaintiff. The documentation will show the shoddy unlawful and unethical behavior of the above Judges. “That the appearance of Justice is as important as Justice itself” the appearance and actions of the above Judges will show to be willful acts that were and are malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, and grossly reckless because the Plaintiff was Catholic.
4. That the Judges and attorneys have ignored the Laws and Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia, the Constitution of Virginia and the United States of America Constitution.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
5. This court has original jurisdiction of federal questions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 – 1332. The court has supplemental jurisdiction of state claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367. Venue is proper in this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2). That Defendant Ilona Grenadier Heckman is a resident of the District of Columbia since on or around 1986. That Grenadier, Anderson, Starace, Duffett & Kiesler have licensed attorneys in the District as well as several other states and do business in the District of Columbia and surrounding states making this a multi-jurisdictional matter which this court has jurisdiction and authority. This court has jurisdiction under FRCP Rule 1, 2, & 3 and 28 U.S.C. § 45.
Further this court has Jurisdiction per: 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a)(3) (1993) provides as follows:
(a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action authorized by law to be commenced by any person: . . . (3) To redress the deprivation, under color of any State law, statute, ordinance, regulation, custom or usage, of any right, privilege or immunity secured by the Constitution of the United States or by any Act of Congress providing for equal rights of citizens or of all persons within the jurisdiction of the United States.
28 U.S.C. § 1331 (1993) provides that “district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws or treaties of the United States”
a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action authorized by law to be commenced by any person: (1) To recover damages for injury to his person or property, or because of the deprivation of any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, by any act done in furtherance of any conspiracy mentioned in section 1985 of Title 42; (2) To recover damages from any person who fails to prevent or to aid in preventing any wrongs mentioned in section 1985 of Title 42 which he had knowledge were about to occur and power to prevent;
(3) To redress the deprivation, under color of any State law, statute, ordinance, regulation, custom or usage, of any right, privilege or immunity secured by the Constitution of the United States or by any Act of Congress providing for equal rights of citizens or of all persons within the jurisdiction of the United States; (4) To recover damages or to secure equitable or other relief under any Act of Congress providing for the protection of civil rights, including the right to vote.
Any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.
6. Plaintiff incorporates herein by reference all of the allegations contained in
Paragraphs 1 through 6 of this Complaint
7. Plaintiff – Janice Wolk Grenadier (JWG) is the Victim of the above Defendants since October of 1985, and LLM since May of 2013 when she began stalking of Plaintiff. The Circuit Court Judges and the Supreme Court of Virginia since prior to but took notice of such discrimination in September of 2007.
8. Defendant Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman (IGH) a lawyer is guilty of the following and this can be proven with documents and witness’s Perjury, Obstruction of Justice, Aiding and abetting obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the Court, Involvement of Forgery, Theft of money from the Sonia Grenadier Trust account through her law office for great personal gain over $10 Million in Real Estate, Theft of Herman Grenadier, malpractice, Bribery, Abuse of her Oath of Office, Conspiracy, Collusion, Miscarriage of Justice, preventing Due Process, conflict of interest – related to the practice of law, violating code of ethics, has liability to her victims, has violated Plaintiffs Religious, Political, United state Constitutional, Virginia Constitutional and Civil Rights, Breach of Fiduciary Duties, RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT, Title 18 US code 241 Conspiracy against rights, and 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law, Retaliatory & Retribution actions, Treason, Title VI Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI, 42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq., was enacted as part of the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964, 18 USC§ 912. With her Intention to 18 USC § 1341 -Frauds and swindles, Defraud, Breach of Contract, Arbitrary and Capricious behavior, Committed Fraud on the Court, § 18.2-498.3. Misrepresentations prohibited, § 18.2-172 - Forging, uttering, etc., other writings et al. All of above charges will be proven with letters, documents, witnesses who have also been harmed by the actions of Defendant Ilona.
THE ABOVE IS THE MOTIVATION OF ILONA GRENADIER HECKMANS going to the extremes that she is to stop the Truth from coming in front of a Judge. All actions from the IGH and her firm have been willful acts that were and are malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, and grossly reckless. That if tried as Jim Arthur did 5 years in jail, could go to jail and loose her license to practice law. The VSB is ignoring her actions as she with the interest off her Trust account, dues and other donations pays the salaries of the employees of the Virginia State Bar. Ben DiMuro her lawyer is a past President of the VSB and has donated 10% of his estate to them when he dies
9. Defendant GRENADEIR ANDERSON STRARACE DUFFETT & KEISLER, PC (GAS) a law firm in Virginia with licensed partners in the District of Columbia. The firm consists of Ilona Grenadier Heckman founding partner, Charles Anderson, Arlene Starace, Benton S. Duffett III, Shirly Keisler, Elaine Vadas, John T. Winkler II, Lisa L. Levi, Carole A. Rubin, Carrie M. Patterson, Carolyn M. Abbate, Katherine D. Smith, Eric R. Nouri – are all aware of this situation and are inclusion to protect Defendant IGH. All actions from the law firm have been willful acts that were and are malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, and grossly reckless.
10. Defendant State of Virginia should be held responsible for the actions of the collusion of the roles the following agencies of the State were in collusion to prevent Plaintiff’s Constitutional right to Due Process – City of Alexandria, Circuit Court Judges, Commonwealth Attorney, State Police, The Legislature of Virginia, City of Alexandria Police, VSB, JIRC all Supreme Court Justices and Chief Justice The Honorable Cynthia D. Kinser Plaintiff learned from LLM of her being Jewish and by all appearance from the blog that she also was in collusion because of Plaintiff being Catholic. This was new evidence to Plaintiff. Circuit Court Hon. Lisa Bondareff Kemler, Presiding Judge, Chief Judge Plaintiff has been aware all along this defendant was Jewish. That her last signed Order was irrational and Treason on the Court. She went to Hebrew school with Plaintiff’s x husband. Her father was Plaintiff’s girl’s pediatrician, and Plaintiff resisted naming her in this Treason. With a very heavy heart Plaintiff has to look at the facts and realize her motivation is because I am Catholic. Her actions in October of 2012 returning documents that had been filed in Court, to prevent the Truth and the accounting of what Ilona Grenadier Heckman was responsible to Plaintiff was Treason on the Court. All actions will show to have been willful acts that were and are malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, and grossly reckless. The State of Virginia Attorney’s General along was aware of these actions and refused to give the state police the power to investigate. That when Attorney fees are awarded to attorneys with more billable hours to Judge’s Chambers then to their clients and such bills were found acceptable to the Supreme Court of Virginia. The State of Virginia’s Treason on the Courts by Judges, attorneys and their representatives will show to have been willful acts that were and are malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, and grossly reckless. Justice is supposed to be blind. In Bullock v. United States, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985), the court stated "Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury. ... It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function --- thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted." But not only are trial judges required to be fair and impartial, they must also 'satisfy’ the appearance of justice. The trial judge's 'appearance,' or conduct and behavior, appearance of bias alone is grounds for reversal even if the trial judge is, in fact, completely impartial.
11. LORETTA LAX MILLER –aka- LEAH LAX –aka-MUGGY CAT –aka- BILLY SULLIVAN (LLM et al) Presidential Candidate for 2016 Emails will show started stalking JWG in May of 2013, is involved in stalking, hacking of Plaintiff’s computer and e-mail. Is responsible for the jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com. That she has on her personal and others to campaign Facebook, Twitter and Blogs supported the site since the start of it. That her personal comment on the first written page is similar to other behavior in e-mails of hers to try and act as if she is not Muggy Cat or Billy Sullivan – emails will show how this can be and should be questioned. All actions will show to have been willful acts that were and are malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, and grossly reckless.
The Stalking and Malicious Treatment of Plaintiff by Defendants Ilona and Defendant Leah Lax et al along with others This e-mail alone sent by Presidential Candidate for 2016 with the collusion of lawyer Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier and other e-mails that were falsified in a website jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com say Plaintiff is racist against others is enough to prove liable intent – Yet Plaintiff has supplied other evidence in her defense. This e-mail is not the only one Plaintiff will enter into evidence at the appropriate time several e-mails similar in nature to this. The Hate defendants have for Catholics, Christians, Muslims, Homosexuals and with the picture of and the talk of First Lady Michele Obama having a penis you could add in my opinion African Americans. No matter what your opinion on Hillary Clinton or Michele Obama are – the disrespect is disgusting and according to the law liable.
The above e-mail strand shows the actions of Leah Lax et al is one in the same Muggy Cats / Billy Sullivan. That Plaintiff concerned for Leah Lax et al contacted the FBI to keep her safe. That the personal actions of Leah Lax et al are willful acts that were and are malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, and grossly reckless. that Plaintiff will show she worked in collusion with Defendant Ilona a lawyer.
12. CAMPAIGN FOR LORETTA LAX MILLER and all employees/volunteers – LLM et al has made statements on her Blog, Twitter and Facebook thanking by all appearance her campaign/employees/volunteers in slandering and deformation of JWG. All actions from the campaign have been willful acts that were and are malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, and grossly reckless.
That Plaintiff will be able to show that Leah Lax et al and her Campaign is a Fraud. She has yet to file a Financial disclosure with the FEC and collecting donations since 2011, and has several outlets that she is collecting money for her campaign this is a quote off of her Piryx site.
I affirm that the following statements are true and accurate:
Contributions to LORETTA MILLER are not deductible as charitable contributions for federal income tax purposes. Contributions from foreign nationals and federal government contractors are prohibited. LORETTA MILLER is registered with the Federal Election Commission as an independent expenditure committee. Accordingly, we may accept unlimited contributions from individuals, corporations, and other organizations. Your contribution is not subject to FEC limits. LORETTA MILLER spending is independent, and it does not make contributions to, or coordinate its spending with, any candidates or political parties
13. Plaintiff incorporates herein by reference all of the allegations contained in
Paragraphs 1 through 13 of this Complaint. Plaintiff incorporates the Emergency Restraining Order and Injunction filed on January 22, 2014 along with the notarized Filed Complaint with the FEC filed with the Emergency Restraining Order and Injunction.
History Plaintiff in September of 2007 went to Court in the City of Alexandria Virginia. Plaintiff had followed all the rules of filing and service. Defendant Ilona a lawyer lied in court to the Judge, and the Judge reprimanded Plaintiff telling her not to re-file until October 2007. Plaintiff that night met a Federal Judge from this court. He informed Plaintiff of her rights –He informed Plaintiff “You shouldn’t be crying you should be rejoicing – You have just won your case – No Judge likes a lawyer lying to him in court” on a napkin he outlined what I was going to put in Plaintiff’s Motion for Default. That Motion for Default was not heard until December of 2007 when the Judges could find a retired Judge to rule in the favor of Defendant Ilona this practice would continue and continues today. The Judges and the evidence shows this is not the last time the documents and statements in court by Defendant Ilona and others have not been disingenuous all the way to the Supreme Court of Virginia. The slippery slope that would open up the truth of how Plaintiff since October of 1985 had been manipulate and that the actions were and are still willful acts that are malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or grossly reckless. The Law is very clear that the Judges who have acted by ruling in Favoritism and Cronyism and not by the Rules of the Supreme Court. “Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States, wars against that Constitution and engages in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), he is without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason.” “U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S. Ct. 471, 66 Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821)”
Plaintiff is aware of and understands the difficulties for any Judge in this case. But, the law has been abused and broken by the State of Virginia’s judicial system and Plaintiff will be able to show this is not a unique situation but, normal practice in the State of Virginia. The difference is they have not been able to kill Plaintiff or break Plaintiff, and Plaintiff prays this court look at the evidence in documents and gives Plaintiff the right to be heard. “No man in this country is so high that he is above the law. No officer of the law may set that law at defiance with impunity. All the officers of the government from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the law, and are bound to obey it.” Butz v. Economou, 98 S.Ct. 2894 (1978); United States v. Lee, 106 U.S. at 220, 1 S.Ct. at 261 (1882)” “Further it is the obligation of every Judge to honor, abide by, and uphold not only the Constitution and laws of the State, but they are bound by the laws and Constitution of the United States as well.” “State courts, like federal courts, have a constitutional obligation to safeguard personal liberties and to uphold federal law.” Stone v Powell, 428 US 465, 483 n 35, 96 S. Ct 3037, 49 L Ed. 2d 1067 (1976)” “Whenever any officer of the court commits fraud during a proceeding in the court, he/she is engaged in “fraud upon the court”. In Bulloch v. United States, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985),
The Constitution of the United States A fundamental, guarantee that all legal proceedings will be fair and that one will be given notice of the proceedings and an opportunity to be heard before the government acts to take away one's life, liberty, or property. Also, a constitutional guarantee that a law shall not be unreasonable, Arbitrary, or capricious.
The constitutional guarantee of due process of law, found in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, prohibits all levels of government from arbitrarily or unfairly depriving individuals of their basic constitutional rights to life, liberty, and property. The Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment ratified in 1791, asserts that no person shall "be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." This amendment restricts the powers of the federal government and applies only to actions by it. The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, declares,"[N]or shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law" (§ 1). This clause limits the powers of the states, rather than those of the federal government.
Plaintiff can show harm and the harm that has forever been done to her from the actions of the above Defendants. Plaintiff may not have put all information in the best order – but, has done the best she can do. She has done it with a pure heart and honest way and still has not had her day in court to be heard. Plaintiff has still had not had due process Boddie v. Connecticut, 401 U.S. 371 (1971), was a case before the United States Supreme Court giving the right to due process and to be heard.
Plaintiff’s ability to perform simple every day work has been stripped of her by the actions of the above Defendants with her social media, her computers and e-mail being hacked and this court is looking the other way.
Breach of Contract – Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing – Breach of Contractual Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing
14. Plaintiff incorporates herein by reference all of the allegations contained in
Paragraphs 1 through 14 of this Complaint
15. By virtue of the facts stated above, defendants have violated their contractual duty of good faith and fair dealing. Plaintiff has paid fees to these courts and not received Due Process.
16. The above defendants and defendant’s representatives breached their contractual duty of good faith and fair dealing when Judges ruled in Favoritism and Cronyism. When Judge’s did not have Jurisdiction and chose friends/other Judges who would not follow the rules but would rules as told.
17. That the above defendants Breach of Contract includes not limited to their involvement being disingenuous in documents filed with the courts and Orders. The documents will speak for themselves the defendants were aware of these breaches as lawyers and Judges.
18. Plaintiff through implied covenant of good faith and Fair Dealing continued to follow the Rules of the Courts.
19. The defendant’s “flagrantly violated” their Fiduciary responsibility to the Judicial System and Plaintiff to deal in Good Faith while Plaintiff continued to deal in Good Faith. The actions will be proven factually by Orders, Letters, Documents filed in the court and other. That the constitutional Right of Due Process has been denied time and time again.
Violation Title 42 § 1983 Civil Rights Statue
Civil Rights Act of 1968 enacted 18 USC 245
20. Plaintiff incorporates herein by reference all of the allegations contained in
Paragraphs 1 through 19 of this Complaint
21. Defendants used unfair/unconscionable means to try and intimitad and scare Plaintiff – They have acted as the Klue Klux Klan would have in the past. Plaintiff is aware that Plaintiff must show that Plaintiff can prove each element of alleged facts in her claims. That to seek relief for the violation of a person’s Federal and Constitution rights under Title 42 § 1983 it allows Plaintiff to her rights contained in the United States Constitution as defined by Federal Law.
22. Plaintiff has been discriminated against for being Catholic That Civil Rights Act of 1968 enacted 18 USC 245 prevents discrimination due to Religion That this is a Hate Crime and “Hate crime laws are colorblind” Fact the case which the Supreme Court upheld hate crimes of the First amendment attach, Wisconsin v. Mitchell, 508 U.S. 476(1993) involved a white victim.
23. Plaintiff has been discriminated against for being black balled by the Old Boy’s Network / Judicial Community due to her x-husband being the son of the late Judge Albert Grenadier whom was the Husband to Defendant Ilona a lawyer who has also intervened into Defendants Divorce. That the discrimination and segregation among white exist the power Hierarchy by a member of one that is considered by others inferior to the other.
Consumer Protection Act
24. Plaintiff incorporates herein by reference all of the allegations contained in
Paragraphs 1 through 24 of this Complaint.
25. The State of Virginia was paid for serves in the Court that were denied Plaintiff because she was Catholic. That the discrimination and segregation among white exist the power Hierarchy by a member of one that is considered by others inferior to the other.
Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Unjust Enrichment/Constructive Trust
26. Plaintiff incorporates herein by reference all of the allegations contained in
Paragraphs 1 through 26 of this Complaint
27. That the State of Virginia had a Fiduciary Duty to insure the rights and safety of Plaintiff in the and through the Court system. Plaintiff has been harmed by the false statements which are considered defamatory – that Plaintiff has “ THE TRUTH” which is an absolute defense . That the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution was designed to protect Freedom of the press. The 1964 case New York Times Co. v. Sullivan radically changed the nature of libel law by establishing a suit for libel you needed to prove that the information was wholly and patently false or that it was published “with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not”
Injunctive / Declaratory Relief
28. Plaintiff incorporates herein by reference all of the allegations contained in
Paragraphs 1 through 28 of this Complaint
29. That Plaintiff now needs to pray this court grants temporary or permanent injunctive relief as Plaintiff’s reputation has been harmed for life. That Plaintiff as anyone else in the United States should have easy and fair access to the courts. That no one should be denied access and fair treatment due to race, age, sexual orientation.
30. To warrant preliminary injunctive relief, the moving party must show
A. Substantial likelihood of success on the merits – Plaintiff believes she has provided this court with the information needed to outline the actions of both defendants and the Criminal actions of all the Defendants along with documentation that should without doubt assure this court
B. That she would suffer irreparable injury if the injunction were not granted – Plaintiff has a child friendly product that has been for ever harmed by the loss of Social Media, the blog jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com the e-mails that were created by or from the hacking of Plaintiff’s computer that state the following – AGAIN PLAINTIFF HAS NEVER SAID THIS! Plaintiff WILL BE PROVE These e-mails to BE THE FRIVOLOUS imaginative of Defendants to permanently harm Plaintiff. Just the name of the blog itself is offensive and violates Plaintiffs’ Constitutional rights – and is libel and deformation of character of Plaintiff - jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com
Thursday, January 9, 2014
If you want to read what sick piece of garbage Janice Wolk Grenadier aka Granny Panties is, you should read the newest email sent to us by her.
From: JWG <email@example.com>
To: muggycatscreams <firstname.lastname@example.org>; leahlax1234< email@example.com>
Sent: Wed , Jan 8, 2014 1:40 pm
Subject: I hope your son DIES
I hope your son dies during his surgery tomorrow! It will be one less JEW BOY out there. He should have died at childbirth. You can bury your son and then die after!
What kind of sick piece of garbage does that? What kind of sick, evil, and sadistic person would tell a mother that they hope her kid dies during surgery? This shows what kind of sick, sadistic evil piece of filth that Janice Wolk Grenadier is and should be put away for her sick actions. Who would wish a person death? Janice Wolk Grenadier would.
We here at Muggy Cat want to wish your son a healthy recovery on his surgery Ms. Lax Miller. We are so sorry you are being harassed by that sick woman.
This explains it's self
From: JWG <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: muggycatscreams <email@example.com>
Sent: Tue , Jan 7, 2014 12:15 am
Subject: Re: Had it with you!
Look you Jew Bastard I had it with you and now you are going to pay.
Is this the writing of a crazy woman
From: JWG <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: muggycatscreams <email@example.com>; leahlax1234 <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Sun , Jan 5, 2014 9:45 pm
Subject: YOU FUCKING JEWSYou refuse to take my side. I wrote to you about my problems and you called me names
"Me and My family had nothing to do with your girls because you raised them Catholic" by - Jewish attorney Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman - of Grenadier, Anderson, Starace, Duffet & Kiesler
Israel wants the United States of America to defend them - yet some of the most powerful Jews in the Washington DC area - are discriminating against Catholics, Corrupting the Judicial System, and Cheating the IRS. - My personal opinion is we need to be friends with Israel - But, they have to have the same respect for other religions - and for the Laws and the Rules of the Supreme Courts and the United States of America's Constitution - Very powerful Jews in the DC area Ilona Ely Freedman Heckman and Yoav Katz are using their money and power to buy their war around the Judicial System and cheat the IRS! you can read more at www.valaw2010.blogspot.com
Now you tell Ilona to give me my money.
No one is going to believe you. They will believe me because I tell the TRUTH! and you Jews all lie. Jews like you belong in your graves. I deserve that money!
I have a gun and I know how to use it!
When Hillary gets into office, I am going to make sure all of you FUCKING JEWS are put into concentration camps to die. I support Hillary and she hates you FUCKING JEWS!
This letter came to us here at Muggy Cat at 9:45 PM EST. Doesn't this show the kind of obsession that Janice Wolk Grenadier has against anyone that doesn't agree with her. What is next? Is she going to go after our families? However she went after her family or should we say ex-family who disowned her. We have posted previous letters that Janice Wolk Grenadier had sent to her family in previous blog posts.
Now here is something really funny and intersting about Janice Wolk Grenadier. Well actually a few funny things. Today she was seen naked in her back yard building an ice alter to her Dark Lord Satan. She was doing this in the freezing rain. The scary part was she had icicles hanging from her oversized nipples and from her pubic hair. She then took a large icicle and began to masterbate with it until it melted.
A neighbor had seen Janice Wolk Grenadier walking out of a sex shop Friday night with a large bag filled with sex toys and two very large women who looked like Amazons. They were seen driving to a gay bar in which Janice and the two women frequent and have pajama parties afterwards. She left Saturday morning with her hair disarray and a smile on her face. A dog collar could be seen around her neck and welts on her arms and legs. We don't think she is the dominant one in this relationship. Family services should have taken her kids away from her years ago. She neglected them for her sexual pleasures and alcohol addiction.
Janice Wolk Grenadier adores her Fuher Adolf Hitler who was also bi-sexual. Janice Wolk Grenadier has been seen wearing a painted on mustache just like her idol and walking around wearing a Swasticka on her rare selfie of Janice Wolk Grenadier
This classless woman should be put away in a padded cell so she can't hurt anyone else. Someone please call the authorities to have her institutionalized for her safety and for the safety of others. Remember she carries a gun!
Janice Wolk Grenadier supports the Anti Christs Obama and Hillary Clinton
Not only is Janice Wolk Grenadier a traitor to the American people by being a card carrying Commie Pinko but she is also supporting the Anti Christs Obama and Hillary Clinton. Yes we said it here, Anti Christs meaning plural. Why is Janice doing this? Because they are not only going to let her keep her hairy vag but they are going to give her the chance to grow a penis as well. Well penises. Yes, Janice Wolk Grenadier will have 6 penises all over her body including one over her vagina. The other 5 will be as so: one in the palm of each hand, one on the bootom of each foot and one right where a tramp stamp would be on her back. That way when Janice Wolk Grenadier dies, she can go to Allah's heaven and have her 72 virgins. These 72 virgins will be a mix of males and females that she can rape with all of her penises and then the next morning at sun up they become virgins again. We have figured it out that the fetal body of little Joshua that Janice keeps in the basement of her home is going to be the vessel for the Dark Lord Satan himself to resurrect in a human body to carry out the apocolypse. That way, Janie Wolk Grenadier is guaranteed her 6 penises.
Proof she supports the Anti Christ is in her letters she has posted and her other posts of Hillary's and Obama's support defending both on everything Loretta Lax Miller fought against including the ObamaCare and Islamic Terrorism which Obama and Hillary support. Janice is for the destruction of the Catholic Church's values of having Nuns despense birthcontroll pills. Janice supports this by supporting Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Husein Obama. Everything Obama stands for is to destroy American Family Values and Janice has no values and worships Satan.
We at Muggy Cat take the religious stand that Janice is the Anti Christ and does not beleive in God and the wonders God has done on this Earth. Maybe Janice should move to sin city Las Vegas and sell her soul as well as her fugly body on the strip since she is whoring for Satan.
From: JWG <email@example.com>
To: muggycatscreams <firstname.lastname@example.org>; leahlax1234 <email@example.com>
Sent: Wed , Jan 1, 2014 10:45 am
Subject: Re: i agree with you
You FUCKEN JEWS!!!!!! ALL OF YOU . DICK FARREL JOSH COHEN, LEAH LAX AKA LORETTA LAX MILLER AND THE REST OF YOU FUCKEN 30 JEWS. Hitler was right! Ya'll deserve to die! YOU SHOULD BE PLACED IN A BIG OVEN.
We hope that you join us on Friday, January 10th, 2014 outside of Janice Wolk Grenadier's house to protest her anti-American pro-Satan values. Email us at firstname.lastname@example.org for Janice Wolk Grenadier's address. We are expecting at least 200 people so don't forget to bring Holy Water from your church to purify and sactify the land of the supporter of the Anti Christ and the mother of the vessel of Satan. We will have a prayer session to pray for her lack of soul but do not look her straight in the eyes or you will be turned to stone.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook Labels: CIA, FBI, Hillary Rodman Clinton, Janice Wolk Grenadier, KGB, leah lax, MI5, MI6, My Pillow Pack, Obama, virginia law 2010
That the above is just 3 pages out of almost 200 printed out pages of slander and Libel of Plaintiff by Defendants. Plaintiff felt the e-mails that bear her name THAT PLAINTIFF DID NOT WRITE should hold a lot of wait in what Plaintiff will be able to prove.
C. That an injunction would not substantially injure other interested parties and This blog has hurt no one but Plaintiff and her ability to market and advertise a Child Friendly product. This blog and other actions were deliberate willful acts that are and were malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or grossly reckless. That the hacking and killing of Plaintiff’s computers was malicious and has also prevented Plaintiff the right to market her product.
D. That the public interest would be furthered by the injunction – the HATE CRIME OF THIS is sinful and that this court cannot see that becomes questionable to the rational of fairness. That the sexual and in appropriate photos of Hillary Clinton and Michele Obama in there blogs – The racist and religious overtures of HATE BY DEFENDENTS is so obvious that to have to go any further would show Bias by this court and any one of normal moral value. . “Fairness of course requires an absence of actual bias in the trial of cases. But our system of law has always endeavored to prevent even the probability of unfairness. “In re Murchinson, 349 U.S. 133, 136 (1955)” Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967) was a landmark civil rights decision of the United States Supreme Court against discrimination. Which includes being discriminated because the Judge’s, lawyers, elected officials and government employees have decided you are not a part of or one of them.
Common Law Fraud12 U.S.C 1972
31. Plaintiff incorporates herein by reference all of the allegations contained in
Paragraphs 1 through 31 of this Complaint.
32. On several occasions Plaintiff asked the courts to review and asked for a Special Grand Jury to look into the allocations of misconduct. Plaintiff was to go in front of the Grand Jury with her witness’s – But, instead was kidnapped in a different Court Room and Grand Jury was dismissed prior to her being allowed into ask for the Special Grand Jury..
Negligence – the negligent infliction of emotional distress; the intentional infliction of emotional distress
33. Plaintiff incorporates herein by reference all of the allegations contained in
Paragraphs 1 through 34 of this Complaint
34. The defendant’s had a legal duty to use reasonable care in statements posted on the internet about Plaintiff. They did not do this. They have posted several lies about Plaintiff and others. They have done ruined Plaintiff reputation and should be held financially and legally responsible for their actions.
35. The defendant’s malicious actions caused great emotional distress to Plaintiff. By the Commonwealth Attorneys orders of the City of Alexandria police to never take a complaint from Plaintiff? Plaintiff has been harmed by the false statements which are considered defamatory – that Plaintiff has “ THE TRUTH” which is an absolute defense . That the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution was designed to protect Freedom of the press. The 1964 case New York Times Co. v. Sullivan radically changed the nature of libel law by establishing a suit for libel you needed to prove that the information was wholly and patently false or that it was published “with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not”. Plaintiff has been put into an unfair and dangerous position to protect herself and her girls.
36. The actions of the actors to cause this emotional distress were malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or grossly reckless.
37. Plaintiff incorporates herein by reference all of the allegations contained in
Paragraphs 1 through 37 of this Complaint
38. The defendants were deceptive of material misrepresentations of past and existing facts and remained silent when a duty to speak existed.
39. The defendant’s actions were Arbitrary and Capricious absence of a rational connection between the facts found and the choice’s made, made choices that were not in accordance with the law.
40. Plaintiff incorporates herein by reference all of the allegations contained in
Paragraphs 1 through 40 of this Complaint
41. The Collusion of the Defendants actions show collusion to harm Plaintiff from and was done with malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or grossly reckless intentions.
42. Defendants Civil Conspiracy to Commit Tortious Interference with Contractual Relations abuse of process, intentional infliction of emotional distress,
43. Civil conspiracy to commit injurious falsehood with jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com that Plaintiff has a “protected characteristic” which will be proven as to why Plaintiff was sought out by Defendant and that factor is why Plaintiff was targeted by Defendants
44. Defendants were in collusion of civil conspiracy to intentionally inflict emotional distress.
The Four Basic Freedoms Guaranteed by the Bill of Rights
45. Plaintiff incorporates herein by reference all of the allegations contained in
Paragraphs 1 through 45 of this Complaint
46. Plaintiff will prove a violation of Plaintiffs Bill of Rights the Four Basic freedoms are being Violated -
The Four Freedoms
Plaintiff will show the actions of the Defendants were actions that were willful acts were malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or grossly reckless That the defendants were acting under the color of State and Federal law. That the Constitutional Rights of due process are factual allegations that will be proven through documents, letters, e-mails and actions of defendants. That defends had been given notice, and this court is aware of with the threat from Defendant Ilona’s attorney. That Defendants never filed a response, in regard to the Restraining Order and Injunction. Defendants were notified on or around January 22, 2014 and Order was not written until January 31, 2014 with NOT ONE Defendant responding or disputing Plaintiff’s facts.
47. Plaintiff incorporates information filed in this court:
January 23, 2014 Emergency Restraining Order w/FEC Complaint
January 24, 2014 Verifyed Compliant - to be amended
January 24, 2014 Request for Emergency restraining Order and Injection with other Evidence
January 31, 2014 2nd Request for Emergency Restraining Order and Injunction with Other Evidence
February 2, 2014 3rd request for Emergency Restraining Order and Injection with Other Evidence and to go in front of a Judge.
February 3, 2014 Motion to be heard by a Judge
February 6, 2014 4th Request for EMERGENCY RESTRAINING ORDER and INJUNCTION WITH OTHER EVIDENCE and to be heard by a Judge “The appearance of Justice is as Important as Justice itself”
February 10, 2014 EMERGENCY RECONDIDERATION OF ORDER Jan 31, 2014
5th Request from Plaintiff to be heard by a Judge to explain VERY complicated Situation of Request for Emergency Restraining Order and Injunctions
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests that this Court:
A. All actions requested in the Emergency Restraining Order and Injunction
B. The right to go in front of a Federal Grand Jury with her witnesses and ask for a special Grand Jury to look into the Virginia Judicial System.
C. Enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants, jointly and severally in their official and personal capacities;
D. Enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff for the $5 Million + that Defendant Ilona manipulated and stole from Plaintiff.
E. Enter an order declaring Defendants’ conduct unconstitutional;
F. Enter an order declaring Defendants’ conduct negligent;
G. Award Plaintiff compensatory, punitive, exemplary damages against Defendants;
H. Award Plaintiff if joined with counsel reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs;
I. Enter a permanent injunction requiring Defendants to remove all information that has been put on the internet by Defendants that is fraudulent, disingenuous, libel and deformation of Plaintiff Character.
J. Grant to Plaintiff such other and further relief as this Honorable Court may deem just and proper under the circumstances, including but not limited to appropriate injunctive relief.
Plaintiff demands a jury trial, pursuant to the Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Date: February 17, 2014 Respectfully submitted,
Janice Wolk Grenadier
15 West Spring Street
Alexandria, Virginia 22301
Telephone (202) 368-7178
Loretta Miller BFF w/ Ilona Grenadier Heckman & SUPPORTED by WBDF aka WBDFRadio.com out of St. Petersburg, Florida who is supported by Gulf Stream Parks.
jwgrenadier/ jw grenadier
What is the difference? Leah Lax's et al words on one of her many places she is asking for donation's states - She is above the Law and need not disclose donations - As the FEC has verified she has never filed paper work -
SUPPORTED by WBDF aka WBDFRadio.com out of St. Petersburg, Florida who is supported by Gulf Stream Parks.
- Share This Page
- Tweet 0
- First NameRequired
- Middle Name
- Last NameRequired
- Home AddressRequired
- Home PhoneRequired
- Work Phone
- Fax Phone
- Mobile Phone
- Routing Number
- Account Number
- Same as home address.
- Billing Address
- I want to donate the above amount a single time.
- I want to donate the above amount today and continue donating monthly for starting February 28.
Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 2:05 PM
Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 10:39 AM