2016 AMERICA FIRST LORETTA MILLER CAMPAIGN: News Release January 8,2014: The Committee to Elect Loretta Lax Miller just received a very generous contribution from Larry Page owner and CEO of Google . We also want...
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)
Blog Archive
Translate
|
Wednesday, January 8, 2014
The Committee to Elect Loretta Lax Miller just received a very generous contribution from Larry Page owner and CEO of Google .
We also want to thank Linkedin CEO, Jeff Weiner, Comcast CEO Brian Roberts, George Buckley 3M, Bill Gates, Timothy D Cook, Apple and Bob Iger CEO of Walt Disney company
We also would like to extend a warm hello to Gine Simons of Kiss, Dee Snyder of Twisted Sister , Alice Cooper, and Marilyn Manson. Let us not forget Stan "The Man" Lee for believing in Loretta Lax Miller. BBC for promoting Loretta Lax Miller. The 700 Club of CNS for mentioning Loretta Lax Miller's name . For the Israeli Channel 2 as a guest and Bibi Netanyahu PM for being a close friend for ever.
In February, 2014 Loretta Lax Miller will be a guest on various Main Stream Media TV and Radio Talk shows. Her Political Commercials will begin to air in 2015, Her book Why do I need a Fancy Title will be published in 2015.
We also want to thank Linkedin CEO, Jeff Weiner, Comcast CEO Brian Roberts, George Buckley 3M, Bill Gates, Timothy D Cook, Apple and Bob Iger CEO of Walt Disney company
We also would like to extend a warm hello to Gine Simons of Kiss, Dee Snyder of Twisted Sister , Alice Cooper, and Marilyn Manson. Let us not forget Stan "The Man" Lee for believing in Loretta Lax Miller. BBC for promoting Loretta Lax Miller. The 700 Club of CNS for mentioning Loretta Lax Miller's name . For the Israeli Channel 2 as a guest and Bibi Netanyahu PM for being a close friend for ever.
In February, 2014 Loretta Lax Miller will be a guest on various Main Stream Media TV and Radio Talk shows. Her Political Commercials will begin to air in 2015, Her book Why do I need a Fancy Title will be published in 2015.
UNITED STATES
DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
____________________________________
JANICE WOLK GRENADIER
Pro se
15 West Spring Street
Alexandria, Virginia
22301
jwgrenadier@gmail.com
202-368-7178
Plaintiff
v. Civil
Action No. 14-162
ILIONA GRENADIER HECKMAN AMENDED VERIFYED COMPLAINT.
4200 Massachusetts Ave
Apt 410
Washington
DC 20016-4752
GRENADEIR ANDERSON STRARACE DUFFETT & KEISLER, PC
703-683-9000
649 S. Washington
Street
Alexandria, VA 22314
703-683-9000
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Mark Herring
Office of the Attorney General
900 East Main Street
Richmond, VA 23219
900 East Main Street
Richmond, VA 23219
LAX MILLER –aka- LEAH
LAX –aka-
MUGGY CAT –aka- BILLY
SULLIVAN
Presidential Candidate
for 2016
Campaign
Headquarters
350 Market Street
Highspire, PA 17304
Highspire, PA 17304
CAMPAIGN FOR LORETTA LAX MILLER
And all employees/volunteers
350 Market Street
Highspire, PA 17304
Defendants,
Jointly and Severally, in their
Official and Personal Capacities.
AMENDED VERIFYED
COMPLAINT
(for Applicable Relief and Jury Trial on all Counts)
COMES
NOW Plaintiff Janice
Wolk Grenadier (JWG) reserves the right to amend Complaint and add additional
Parties per FRCP Rule 15. Plaintiff
Janice Wolk Grenadier complains against the captioned Defendants to seek relief
for the violation of Federal and Constitutional rights under Title 42 § 1983,
and under the Bill of Rights the Four Basic Freedoms are being Violated:
Further Claims are outlined
in this complaint.
INTRODUCTION
1. This is an action for appropriate relief pursuant to the common law,
statute and/or Constitution of the United States of America, for impermissible
restraints upon the Plaintiff’s constitutionally protected property,
entitlements and other Constitutional rights, in Violation of a person’s Civil Rights under
18 USC Sec 249 and the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Plaintiff will show statements made by
Defendants are Slanderous, Libel and Defamation of Character of Plaintiff. The False statements that have been published
as Fact and communicated through several e-mails will show defamation. That the statements have forever ruined the
reputation of Plaintiff and her ability to promote a family friendly child
product. The retaliation of Defendants to prevent the “TRUTH” coming out of
IGH - Ilona Grenadier Heckman. That the Treason on the Courts by the Judge’s and the Judge’s they
supervise were willful acts that were and are
malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, and grossly reckless
because the Plaintiff was Catholic.
2.
That
JWG was denied her constitutional right of Due Process in the courts of
Virginia for being Catholic. That under
Title 42 § 1983 will show violation of rights protected by the Constitution and
created by Federal Statute that persons employed by the State of Virginia
acting under color of state law violated Plaintiffs Constitutional rights. That
two Chief Judges (Chief Justice The Honorable Cynthia D.
Kinser and Hon. Lisa Bondareff Kemler, Presiding Judge, Chief Judge) who
are or should be held responsible for the actions of the Judges beneath them in
there subversion. That they are ultimately responsible for the actions in their
courts and both are Jewish and have allowed Judges under their supervision to
rule in Favoritism and Cronyism and for attorneys to be disingenuous in the
documents that they filed in court, and under Judge’s order did not file
documents entered into the record in the Plaintiff’s file in the Circuit Court
of Alexandria. The new evidence under
the Blog,
jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com and the actual actions of the Judges
shows the collusion and the discrimination against Plaintiff for being
Catholic.
3. Plaintiff through Orders and documents
filed in the clerk’s office the City of Alexandria and the Supreme Court of
Virginia will show the pattern of this Hate and illegal Treason on the Courts
and to Plaintiff. The documentation will show the shoddy
unlawful and unethical behavior of the above Judges. “That the appearance of Justice
is as important as Justice itself” the appearance and actions of the above
Judges will show to be willful
acts that were and are malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, and
grossly reckless because the Plaintiff was Catholic.
4.
That
the Judges and attorneys have ignored the Laws and Rules of the Supreme Court
of Virginia, the Constitution of Virginia and the United States of America
Constitution.
JURISDICTION
AND VENUE
5.
This
court has original jurisdiction of federal questions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
1331 – 1332. The court has supplemental
jurisdiction of state claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367. Venue is proper in this court pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2). That Defendant Ilona Grenadier Heckman is a resident of
the District of Columbia since on or around 1986. That Grenadier, Anderson,
Starace, Duffett & Kiesler have licensed attorneys in the District as well
as several other states and do business in the District of Columbia and
surrounding states making this a multi-jurisdictional matter which this court
has jurisdiction and authority. This
court has jurisdiction under FRCP Rule 1,
2, & 3 and 28 U.S.C. § 45.
Further
this court has Jurisdiction per: 28
U.S.C. § 1343(a)(3) (1993) provides as follows:
(a) The district
courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action authorized by law
to be commenced by any person: . . . (3) To redress the deprivation, under
color of any State law, statute, ordinance, regulation, custom or usage, of any
right, privilege or immunity secured by the Constitution of the United States
or by any Act of Congress providing for equal rights of citizens or of all
persons within the jurisdiction of the United States.
28 U.S.C. § 1331 (1993) provides that “district courts shall have original jurisdiction
of all civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws or treaties of the
United States”
a)
The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action
authorized by law to be commenced by any person: (1) To
recover damages for injury to his person or property, or because of the
deprivation of any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, by any
act done in furtherance of any conspiracy mentioned in section 1985 of Title 42; (2) To recover damages from any person who fails to
prevent or to aid in preventing any wrongs mentioned in section 1985 of Title 42 which he had knowledge were about to occur and power to prevent;
(3) To redress the deprivation, under color
of any State law, statute, ordinance, regulation, custom or usage, of any
right, privilege or immunity secured by the Constitution of the United States
or by any Act of Congress providing for equal rights of citizens or of all
persons within the jurisdiction of the United States; (4) To recover damages or to secure equitable
or other relief under any Act of Congress providing for the protection of civil
rights, including the right to vote.
Any Act of Congress applicable exclusively
to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District
of Columbia.
PARTIES
6.
Plaintiff
incorporates herein by reference all of the allegations contained in
Paragraphs
1 through 6 of this Complaint
7.
Plaintiff – Janice Wolk
Grenadier (JWG) is the Victim of the above Defendants since October of 1985,
and LLM since May of 2013 when she began stalking of Plaintiff. The Circuit
Court Judges and the Supreme Court of Virginia since prior to but took notice
of such discrimination in September of 2007.
8. Defendant Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman (IGH)
a lawyer is guilty of the following and
this can be proven with documents and witness’s
Perjury,
Obstruction of Justice, Aiding and abetting obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the
Court, Involvement of Forgery, Theft of money from the Sonia Grenadier Trust
account through her law office for great personal gain over $10 Million in Real
Estate, Theft of Herman Grenadier, malpractice, Bribery, Abuse of
her Oath of Office, Conspiracy, Collusion, Miscarriage of Justice, preventing
Due Process, conflict of interest – related to the practice of law, violating
code of ethics, has liability to her victims, has violated
Plaintiffs Religious, Political, United state Constitutional,
Virginia Constitutional and Civil Rights, Breach of Fiduciary Duties, RULES
OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT, Title 18 US code 241 Conspiracy
against rights, and 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law, Retaliatory
& Retribution actions, Treason, Title VI Civil Rights Act of
1964 Title VI, 42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq., was enacted as part of
the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964, 18
USC§ 912. With her Intention to 18 USC §
1341 -Frauds and swindles, Defraud,
Breach of Contract, Arbitrary and Capricious behavior, Committed Fraud on the
Court, § 18.2-498.3.
Misrepresentations prohibited, § 18.2-172 - Forging, uttering, etc., other writings et al. All of above charges
will be proven with letters, documents, witnesses who have also been harmed by
the actions of Defendant Ilona.
THE ABOVE IS THE MOTIVATION OF ILONA GRENADIER HECKMANS going to the
extremes that she is to stop the Truth from coming in front of a Judge. All actions from
the IGH and her firm have been willful acts that were and are malicious,
violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, and grossly reckless. That if tried as
Jim Arthur did 5 years in jail, could go to jail and loose her license to
practice law. The VSB is ignoring her
actions as she with the interest off her Trust account, dues and other
donations pays the salaries of the employees of the Virginia State Bar. Ben DiMuro her lawyer is a past President of
the VSB and has donated 10% of his estate to them when he dies
.
9.
Defendant
GRENADEIR ANDERSON STRARACE DUFFETT & KEISLER, PC (GAS) a
law firm in Virginia with licensed partners in the District of Columbia. The firm consists of Ilona Grenadier Heckman
founding partner, Charles Anderson, Arlene Starace, Benton S. Duffett III,
Shirly Keisler, Elaine Vadas, John T. Winkler II, Lisa L. Levi, Carole A.
Rubin, Carrie M. Patterson, Carolyn M. Abbate, Katherine D. Smith, Eric R.
Nouri – are all aware of this situation and are inclusion to protect Defendant
IGH. All actions from the law firm have been willful acts that were and are
malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, and grossly reckless.
10. Defendant State of Virginia should be held responsible for the actions of the collusion of the
roles the following agencies of the State were in collusion to prevent
Plaintiff’s Constitutional right to Due Process – City of Alexandria, Circuit Court Judges,
Commonwealth Attorney, State Police, The Legislature of Virginia, City of
Alexandria Police, VSB, JIRC all Supreme Court Justices and Chief Justice The
Honorable Cynthia D. Kinser Plaintiff learned from LLM of her being Jewish and
by all appearance from the blog that she also was in collusion because of
Plaintiff being Catholic. This was new
evidence to Plaintiff. Circuit Court Hon. Lisa Bondareff
Kemler, Presiding Judge, Chief Judge Plaintiff
has been aware all along this defendant was Jewish. That her last signed Order was irrational and
Treason on the Court. She went to Hebrew
school with Plaintiff’s x husband. Her father
was Plaintiff’s girl’s pediatrician, and Plaintiff resisted naming her in this
Treason. With a very heavy heart
Plaintiff has to look at the facts and
realize her motivation is because I am Catholic. Her actions in October of 2012
returning documents that had been filed in Court, to prevent the Truth and the
accounting of what Ilona Grenadier Heckman was responsible to Plaintiff was Treason on the Court. All actions will show to have been
willful acts that were and are malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent,
wanton, and grossly reckless. The State
of Virginia Attorney’s General along was aware of these actions and refused to
give the state police the power to investigate. That when Attorney fees are
awarded to attorneys with more billable hours to Judge’s Chambers then to their
clients and such bills were found acceptable to the Supreme Court of Virginia. The
State of Virginia’s Treason on the
Courts by Judges, attorneys and their representatives will show to have been willful acts that were and are
malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, and grossly reckless. Justice is supposed to be blind. In Bullock v. United
States, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985), the court stated "Fraud upon
the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is
not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or
perjury. ... It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or
influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his
judicial function --- thus where the impartial functions of the court have
been directly corrupted." But not only are trial judges
required to be fair and impartial, they must also 'satisfy’ the appearance of
justice. The trial judge's 'appearance,'
or conduct and behavior, appearance of bias alone is grounds for reversal even
if the trial judge is, in fact, completely impartial.
11. LORETTA LAX MILLER –aka- LEAH LAX –aka-MUGGY
CAT –aka- BILLY SULLIVAN (LLM et al) Presidential Candidate for 2016
Emails will show started stalking JWG in May of 2013, is involved in stalking, hacking of Plaintiff’s computer and
e-mail. Is responsible for the jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com. That she has on her personal and others to
campaign Facebook, Twitter and Blogs supported the site since the start of
it. That her personal comment on the
first written page is similar to other behavior in e-mails of hers to try and
act as if she is not Muggy Cat or Billy Sullivan – emails will show how this
can be and should be questioned. All
actions will show to have been willful acts that were and are malicious,
violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, and grossly reckless.
The
Stalking and Malicious Treatment of Plaintiff by Defendants Ilona and Defendant Leah Lax et al along with
others This e-mail alone sent by
Presidential Candidate for 2016 with the collusion of lawyer Ilona Ely Freedman
Grenadier and other e-mails that were falsified in a website
jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com say Plaintiff is racist against others is
enough to prove liable intent – Yet Plaintiff has supplied other evidence in
her defense. This e-mail is not the only
one Plaintiff will enter into evidence at the appropriate time several e-mails
similar in nature to this. The Hate
defendants have for Catholics, Christians, Muslims, Homosexuals and with the
picture of and the talk of First Lady Michele Obama having a penis you could
add in my opinion African Americans. No
matter what your opinion on Hillary Clinton or Michele Obama are – the
disrespect is disgusting and according to the law liable.
Tue, Dec
24, 2013 at 2:05 PM
|
||
|
||
From:LeahLax1234@aol.com <LeahLax1234@aol.com>
|
Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 10:39 AM
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To: jwgrendier@gmail.com
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The above e-mail strand shows the actions of
Leah Lax et al is one in the same Muggy
Cats / Billy Sullivan. That Plaintiff
concerned for Leah Lax et al contacted the FBI to keep her safe. That the personal actions of Leah Lax et al
are willful acts that were and are
malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, and grossly reckless. that
Plaintiff will show she worked in collusion with Defendant Ilona a lawyer.
12. CAMPAIGN FOR LORETTA LAX MILLER and all
employees/volunteers – LLM et al
has made statements on her Blog, Twitter and Facebook thanking by all
appearance her campaign/employees/volunteers in slandering and deformation of
JWG. All actions
from the campaign have been willful acts that were and are malicious, violent,
oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, and grossly reckless.
That
Plaintiff will be able to show that Leah Lax et al and her Campaign is a
Fraud. She has yet to file a Financial
disclosure with the FEC and collecting donations since 2011, and has several
outlets that she is collecting money for her campaign this is a quote off of
her Piryx site.
I
affirm that the following statements are true and accurate:
Contributions to LORETTA MILLER are not deductible as charitable
contributions for federal income tax purposes. Contributions from foreign
nationals and federal government contractors are prohibited. LORETTA MILLER is
registered with the Federal Election Commission as an independent expenditure
committee. Accordingly, we may accept
unlimited contributions from individuals, corporations, and other
organizations. Your contribution is not subject to FEC limits. LORETTA MILLER
spending is independent, and it does not make contributions to, or
coordinate its spending with, any candidates or political parties
BACKGROUND
13. Plaintiff incorporates herein by reference
all of the allegations contained in
Paragraphs 1 through 13 of this Complaint. Plaintiff incorporates the Emergency
Restraining Order and Injunction filed on January 22, 2014 along with the
notarized Filed Complaint with the FEC filed with the Emergency Restraining
Order and Injunction.
History Plaintiff in September of 2007 went to Court in the City of
Alexandria Virginia. Plaintiff had
followed all the rules of filing and service.
Defendant Ilona a lawyer lied in court to the Judge, and the Judge
reprimanded Plaintiff telling her not to re-file until October 2007. Plaintiff that night met a Federal Judge from this court. He informed
Plaintiff of her rights –He
informed Plaintiff “You shouldn’t be
crying you should be rejoicing – You have just won your case – No Judge likes a
lawyer lying to him in court” on a napkin he outlined what I was going to put
in Plaintiff’s Motion for Default. That
Motion for Default was not heard until December of 2007 when the Judges could
find a retired Judge to rule in the favor of Defendant Ilona this practice
would continue and continues today. The
Judges and the evidence shows this is not the last time the documents and
statements in court by Defendant Ilona and others have not been disingenuous
all the way to the Supreme Court of Virginia.
The slippery slope that would
open up the truth of how Plaintiff since
October of 1985 had been manipulate and that the actions were and are still
willful acts that are malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or
grossly reckless. The Law is very clear that the Judges who have acted by ruling
in Favoritism and Cronyism and not by the Rules of the Supreme Court. “Any judge who does not comply with his oath
to the Constitution of the United States, wars against that Constitution and
engages in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. If a judge does not fully
comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124
U.S. 200 (1888), he is without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in an act
or acts of treason.” “U.S.
v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S. Ct. 471, 66 Ed.2d 392, 406
(1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed
257 (1821)”
Plaintiff
is aware of and understands the difficulties for any Judge in this case. But, the law has been abused and broken by
the State of Virginia’s judicial system and Plaintiff will be able to show this
is not a unique situation but, normal practice in the State of Virginia. The difference is they have not been able to
kill Plaintiff or break Plaintiff, and
Plaintiff prays this court look at the evidence in documents and gives
Plaintiff the right to be heard. “No man in this country is so high that he is above the law. No officer of
the law may set that law at defiance with impunity. All the officers of the
government from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the law, and are
bound to obey it.” Butz v. Economou, 98 S.Ct. 2894 (1978); United States v.
Lee, 106 U.S. at 220, 1 S.Ct. at 261 (1882)”
“Further it is the obligation of every Judge to honor, abide by, and
uphold not only the Constitution and laws of the State, but they are bound by
the laws and Constitution of the United States as well.” “State courts, like federal courts, have a
constitutional obligation to safeguard personal liberties and to uphold federal
law.” Stone v Powell, 428 US 465, 483 n 35, 96 S. Ct 3037, 49
L Ed. 2d 1067 (1976)” “Whenever any
officer of the court commits fraud during a proceeding in the court, he/she is
engaged in “fraud upon the court”. In Bulloch v. United States,
763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985),
The
Constitution of the United States A fundamental, guarantee that all legal
proceedings will be fair and that one will be given notice of the proceedings
and an opportunity to be heard before the government acts to take away one's
life, liberty, or property. Also, a constitutional guarantee that a law shall
not be unreasonable, Arbitrary, or
capricious.
The constitutional guarantee of due process of law, found in the
Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, prohibits all levels
of government from arbitrarily or unfairly depriving individuals of their basic
constitutional rights to life, liberty, and property. The Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment
ratified in 1791, asserts that no person shall "be deprived of life,
liberty, or property, without due process of law." This amendment
restricts the powers of the federal government and applies only to actions by
it. The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868,
declares,"[N]or shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or
property, without due process of law" (§ 1). This clause limits the powers
of the states, rather than those of the federal government.
Plaintiff can show harm and the harm that has forever been done to
her from the actions of the above Defendants.
Plaintiff may not have put all information in the best order – but, has
done the best she can do. She has done
it with a pure heart and honest way and still has not had her day in court to
be heard. Plaintiff has still had not had due
process Boddie
v. Connecticut, 401 U.S. 371 (1971), was a case before the United States Supreme Court giving the right to due process and to be heard.
Plaintiff’s ability to perform simple every day work has been
stripped of her by the actions of the above Defendants with her social media,
her computers and e-mail being hacked and this court is looking the other way.
Claim
1
Breach of Contract – Implied
Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing – Breach of Contractual Duty of Good
Faith and Fair Dealing
14. Plaintiff
incorporates herein by reference all of the allegations contained in
Paragraphs 1 through 14 of this
Complaint
15. By virtue of the facts stated above,
defendants have violated their contractual duty of good faith and fair dealing.
Plaintiff has paid fees to these courts and not received Due Process.
16. The above defendants and defendant’s
representatives breached their contractual duty of good faith and fair dealing
when Judges ruled in Favoritism and Cronyism.
When Judge’s did not have Jurisdiction and chose friends/other Judges
who would not follow the rules but would rules as told.
17. That
the above defendants Breach of Contract includes not limited to their
involvement being disingenuous in
documents filed with the courts and Orders. The documents will speak for
themselves the defendants were aware of these breaches as lawyers and Judges.
18. Plaintiff through implied covenant of good
faith and Fair Dealing continued to follow the Rules of the Courts.
19. The defendant’s “flagrantly violated” their
Fiduciary responsibility to the Judicial System and Plaintiff to deal in Good Faith while
Plaintiff continued to deal in Good Faith. The actions will be proven factually by Orders, Letters,
Documents filed in the court and other. That the constitutional Right of Due
Process has been denied time and time again.
Claim 2
Violation Title 42 § 1983 Civil
Rights Statue
Civil Rights Act of 1968
enacted 18 USC 245
20. Plaintiff
incorporates herein by reference all of the allegations contained in
Paragraphs
1 through 19 of this Complaint
21. Defendants
used unfair/unconscionable means to try and intimitad and scare Plaintiff –
They have acted as the Klue Klux Klan would have in the past. Plaintiff is aware that Plaintiff must show that
Plaintiff can prove each element of alleged facts in her claims. That to seek
relief for the violation of a person’s Federal and Constitution rights under
Title 42 § 1983 it allows Plaintiff to her rights contained in the United
States Constitution as defined by Federal Law.
22. Plaintiff has been discriminated
against for being Catholic That Civil Rights Act of 1968 enacted 18 USC 245
prevents discrimination due to Religion
That this is a Hate Crime and “Hate crime laws are colorblind” Fact the case which the Supreme Court upheld
hate crimes of the First amendment attach, Wisconsin v. Mitchell, 508 U.S.
476(1993) involved a white victim.
23.
Plaintiff has been discriminated against for being
black balled by the Old Boy’s Network / Judicial Community due to her x-husband
being the son of the late Judge Albert
Grenadier whom was the Husband to Defendant Ilona a lawyer who has also
intervened into Defendants Divorce. That
the discrimination and segregation among white exist the power Hierarchy by a
member of one that is considered by others
inferior to the other.
Claim 3
Consumer Protection Act
24. Plaintiff
incorporates herein by reference all of the allegations contained in
Paragraphs
1 through 24 of this Complaint.
25. The
State of Virginia was paid for serves in the Court that were denied Plaintiff
because she was Catholic. That the discrimination and
segregation among white exist the power Hierarchy by a member of one that is
considered by others inferior to the
other.
Claim 4
Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Unjust Enrichment/Constructive Trust
26. Plaintiff
incorporates herein by reference all of the allegations contained in
Paragraphs
1 through 26 of this Complaint
27. That the State of Virginia had a Fiduciary
Duty to insure the rights and safety of Plaintiff in the and through the Court
system. Plaintiff has
been harmed by the false statements which are considered defamatory – that Plaintiff has “ THE TRUTH” which is an absolute defense . That the First Amendment of the U.S.
Constitution was designed to protect Freedom of the press. The 1964 case New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
radically changed the nature of libel law by establishing a suit for libel you
needed to prove that the information was wholly and patently false or that it
was published “with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not”
Claim 5
Injunctive / Declaratory
Relief
28. Plaintiff
incorporates herein by reference all of the allegations contained in
Paragraphs
1 through 28 of this Complaint
29. That
Plaintiff now needs to pray this court grants temporary or permanent injunctive
relief as Plaintiff’s reputation has been harmed for life. That Plaintiff as anyone else in the United
States should have easy and fair access to the courts. That no one should be denied access and fair
treatment due to race, age, sexual orientation.
30.
To warrant preliminary injunctive relief, the moving party must
show
A.
Substantial likelihood
of success on the merits – Plaintiff believes she has provided this court with the
information needed to outline the actions of both defendants and the Criminal
actions of all the Defendants along with documentation that should without
doubt assure this court
B. That she would suffer irreparable injury if the injunction were
not granted – Plaintiff has a child friendly product that has been for ever
harmed by the loss of Social Media, the blog jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com
the e-mails that were created by or from the hacking of Plaintiff’s computer
that state the following – AGAIN PLAINTIFF HAS NEVER SAID THIS! Plaintiff WILL BE PROVE These e-mails to BE THE
FRIVOLOUS imaginative of Defendants to permanently harm Plaintiff. Just
the name of the blog itself is offensive and violates Plaintiffs’
Constitutional rights – and is libel and deformation of character of Plaintiff
- jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com
Thursday, January 9,
2014
If you want to read what sick piece of garbage Janice Wolk
Grenadier aka Granny Panties is, you should read the newest email sent to us by
her.
-----Original Message-----
From: JWG <jwgrenadier3@aol.com>
To: muggycatscreams <muggycatscreams@aol.com>; leahlax1234< leahlax1234@aol.com>
Sent: Wed , Jan 8, 2014 1:40 pm
Subject: I hope your son DIES
I hope your son dies during his surgery tomorrow! It will be one less JEW BOY out there. He should have died at childbirth. You can bury your son and then die after!
Warmly,
JW Grenadier
What kind of sick piece of garbage does that? What kind of sick, evil, and sadistic person would tell a mother that they hope her kid dies during surgery? This shows what kind of sick, sadistic evil piece of filth that Janice Wolk Grenadier is and should be put away for her sick actions. Who would wish a person death? Janice Wolk Grenadier would.
We here at Muggy Cat want to wish your son a healthy recovery on his surgery Ms. Lax Miller. We are so sorry you are being harassed by that sick woman.
-----Original Message-----
From: JWG <jwgrenadier3@aol.com>
To: muggycatscreams <muggycatscreams@aol.com>; leahlax1234< leahlax1234@aol.com>
Sent: Wed , Jan 8, 2014 1:40 pm
Subject: I hope your son DIES
I hope your son dies during his surgery tomorrow! It will be one less JEW BOY out there. He should have died at childbirth. You can bury your son and then die after!
Warmly,
JW Grenadier
What kind of sick piece of garbage does that? What kind of sick, evil, and sadistic person would tell a mother that they hope her kid dies during surgery? This shows what kind of sick, sadistic evil piece of filth that Janice Wolk Grenadier is and should be put away for her sick actions. Who would wish a person death? Janice Wolk Grenadier would.
We here at Muggy Cat want to wish your son a healthy recovery on his surgery Ms. Lax Miller. We are so sorry you are being harassed by that sick woman.
This explains it's self
-----Original Message-----
From: JWG <jwgrenadier3@aol.com>
To: muggycatscreams <muggycatscreams@aol.com>
Sent: Tue , Jan 7, 2014 12:15 am
Subject: Re: Had it with you!
From: JWG <jwgrenadier3@aol.com>
To: muggycatscreams <muggycatscreams@aol.com>
Sent: Tue , Jan 7, 2014 12:15 am
Subject: Re: Had it with you!
Look you Jew Bastard I had it with you and now you are going to pay.
Warmly,
JW Grenadier
Is
this the writing of a crazy woman
-----Original
Message-----
From: JWG <jwgrenadier3@aol.com>
To: muggycatscreams <muggycatscreams@aol.com>; leahlax1234 <leahlax1234@aol.com>
Sent: Sun , Jan 5, 2014 9:45 pm
Subject: YOU FUCKING JEWS
You refuse to take my side. I wrote to you about my problems and you called me names
"Me and My family had nothing to do with your girls because you raised them Catholic" by - Jewish attorney Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman - of Grenadier, Anderson, Starace, Duffet & Kiesler
Israel wants the United States of America to defend them - yet some of the most powerful Jews in the Washington DC area - are discriminating against Catholics, Corrupting the Judicial System, and Cheating the IRS. - My personal opinion is we need to be friends with Israel - But, they have to have the same respect for other religions - and for the Laws and the Rules of the Supreme Courts and the United States of America's Constitution - Very powerful Jews in the DC area Ilona Ely Freedman Heckman and Yoav Katz are using their money and power to buy their war around the Judicial System and cheat the IRS! you can read more at www.valaw2010.blogspot.com
Now you tell Ilona to give me my money.
No one is going to believe you. They will believe me because I tell the TRUTH! and you Jews all lie. Jews like you belong in your graves. I deserve that money!
I have a gun and I know how to use it!
When Hillary gets into office, I am going to make sure all of you FUCKING JEWS are put into concentration camps to die. I support Hillary and she hates you FUCKING JEWS!
Warmly,
JW Grenadier
From: JWG <jwgrenadier3@aol.com>
To: muggycatscreams <muggycatscreams@aol.com>; leahlax1234 <leahlax1234@aol.com>
Sent: Sun , Jan 5, 2014 9:45 pm
Subject: YOU FUCKING JEWS
You refuse to take my side. I wrote to you about my problems and you called me names
"Me and My family had nothing to do with your girls because you raised them Catholic" by - Jewish attorney Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman - of Grenadier, Anderson, Starace, Duffet & Kiesler
Israel wants the United States of America to defend them - yet some of the most powerful Jews in the Washington DC area - are discriminating against Catholics, Corrupting the Judicial System, and Cheating the IRS. - My personal opinion is we need to be friends with Israel - But, they have to have the same respect for other religions - and for the Laws and the Rules of the Supreme Courts and the United States of America's Constitution - Very powerful Jews in the DC area Ilona Ely Freedman Heckman and Yoav Katz are using their money and power to buy their war around the Judicial System and cheat the IRS! you can read more at www.valaw2010.blogspot.com
Now you tell Ilona to give me my money.
No one is going to believe you. They will believe me because I tell the TRUTH! and you Jews all lie. Jews like you belong in your graves. I deserve that money!
I have a gun and I know how to use it!
When Hillary gets into office, I am going to make sure all of you FUCKING JEWS are put into concentration camps to die. I support Hillary and she hates you FUCKING JEWS!
Warmly,
JW Grenadier
This letter came to us here at Muggy Cat at 9:45 PM EST.
Doesn't this show the kind of obsession that Janice Wolk Grenadier has against
anyone that doesn't agree with her. What is next? Is she going to go after our
families? However she went after her family or should we say ex-family who
disowned her. We have posted previous letters that Janice Wolk Grenadier had
sent to her family in previous blog posts.
Now here is something really funny and intersting about Janice Wolk Grenadier. Well actually a few funny things. Today she was seen naked in her back yard building an ice alter to her Dark Lord Satan. She was doing this in the freezing rain. The scary part was she had icicles hanging from her oversized nipples and from her pubic hair. She then took a large icicle and began to masterbate with it until it melted.
A neighbor had seen Janice Wolk Grenadier walking out of a sex shop Friday night with a large bag filled with sex toys and two very large women who looked like Amazons. They were seen driving to a gay bar in which Janice and the two women frequent and have pajama parties afterwards. She left Saturday morning with her hair disarray and a smile on her face. A dog collar could be seen around her neck and welts on her arms and legs. We don't think she is the dominant one in this relationship. Family services should have taken her kids away from her years ago. She neglected them for her sexual pleasures and alcohol addiction.
Janice Wolk Grenadier adores her Fuher Adolf Hitler who was also bi-sexual. Janice Wolk Grenadier has been seen wearing a painted on mustache just like her idol and walking around wearing a Swasticka on her rare selfie of Janice Wolk Grenadier
Now here is something really funny and intersting about Janice Wolk Grenadier. Well actually a few funny things. Today she was seen naked in her back yard building an ice alter to her Dark Lord Satan. She was doing this in the freezing rain. The scary part was she had icicles hanging from her oversized nipples and from her pubic hair. She then took a large icicle and began to masterbate with it until it melted.
A neighbor had seen Janice Wolk Grenadier walking out of a sex shop Friday night with a large bag filled with sex toys and two very large women who looked like Amazons. They were seen driving to a gay bar in which Janice and the two women frequent and have pajama parties afterwards. She left Saturday morning with her hair disarray and a smile on her face. A dog collar could be seen around her neck and welts on her arms and legs. We don't think she is the dominant one in this relationship. Family services should have taken her kids away from her years ago. She neglected them for her sexual pleasures and alcohol addiction.
Janice Wolk Grenadier adores her Fuher Adolf Hitler who was also bi-sexual. Janice Wolk Grenadier has been seen wearing a painted on mustache just like her idol and walking around wearing a Swasticka on her rare selfie of Janice Wolk Grenadier
This classless woman should be put away in a padded cell so
she can't hurt anyone else. Someone please call the authorities to have her
institutionalized for her safety and for the safety of others. Remember she
carries a gun!
Janice Wolk Grenadier
supports the Anti Christs Obama and Hillary Clinton
Not only is Janice Wolk Grenadier a traitor to the
American people by being a card carrying Commie Pinko but she is also
supporting the Anti Christs Obama and Hillary Clinton. Yes we said it here,
Anti Christs meaning plural. Why is Janice doing this? Because they are not
only going to let her keep her hairy vag but they are going to give her the
chance to grow a penis as well. Well penises. Yes, Janice Wolk Grenadier will
have 6 penises all over her body including one over her vagina. The other 5
will be as so: one in the palm of each hand, one on the bootom of each foot and
one right where a tramp stamp would be on her back. That way when Janice Wolk
Grenadier dies, she can go to Allah's heaven and have her 72 virgins. These 72
virgins will be a mix of males and females that she can rape with all of her
penises and then the next morning at sun up they become virgins again. We have
figured it out that the fetal body of little Joshua that Janice keeps in the basement
of her home is going to be the vessel for the Dark Lord Satan himself to
resurrect in a human body to carry out the apocolypse. That way, Janie Wolk
Grenadier is guaranteed her 6 penises.
Proof she supports the Anti Christ is in her letters she has posted and her other posts of Hillary's and Obama's support defending both on everything Loretta Lax Miller fought against including the ObamaCare and Islamic Terrorism which Obama and Hillary support. Janice is for the destruction of the Catholic Church's values of having Nuns despense birthcontroll pills. Janice supports this by supporting Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Husein Obama. Everything Obama stands for is to destroy American Family Values and Janice has no values and worships Satan.
We at Muggy Cat take the religious stand that Janice is the Anti Christ and does not beleive in God and the wonders God has done on this Earth. Maybe Janice should move to sin city Las Vegas and sell her soul as well as her fugly body on the strip since she is whoring for Satan.
-----Original Message-----
From: JWG <jwgrenadier3@aol.com>
To: muggycatscreams <muggycatscreams@aol.com>; leahlax1234 <leahlax1234@aol.com>
Sent: Wed , Jan 1, 2014 10:45 am
Subject: Re: i agree with you
You FUCKEN JEWS!!!!!! ALL OF YOU . DICK FARREL JOSH COHEN, LEAH LAX AKA LORETTA LAX MILLER AND THE REST OF YOU FUCKEN 30 JEWS. Hitler was right! Ya'll deserve to die! YOU SHOULD BE PLACED IN A BIG OVEN.
Warmly,
JW Grenadier
We hope that you join us on Friday, January 10th, 2014 outside of Janice Wolk Grenadier's house to protest her anti-American pro-Satan values. Email us at muggycatscreams@aol.com for Janice Wolk Grenadier's address. We are expecting at least 200 people so don't forget to bring Holy Water from your church to purify and sactify the land of the supporter of the Anti Christ and the mother of the vessel of Satan. We will have a prayer session to pray for her lack of soul but do not look her straight in the eyes or you will be turned to stone.
Proof she supports the Anti Christ is in her letters she has posted and her other posts of Hillary's and Obama's support defending both on everything Loretta Lax Miller fought against including the ObamaCare and Islamic Terrorism which Obama and Hillary support. Janice is for the destruction of the Catholic Church's values of having Nuns despense birthcontroll pills. Janice supports this by supporting Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Husein Obama. Everything Obama stands for is to destroy American Family Values and Janice has no values and worships Satan.
We at Muggy Cat take the religious stand that Janice is the Anti Christ and does not beleive in God and the wonders God has done on this Earth. Maybe Janice should move to sin city Las Vegas and sell her soul as well as her fugly body on the strip since she is whoring for Satan.
-----Original Message-----
From: JWG <jwgrenadier3@aol.com>
To: muggycatscreams <muggycatscreams@aol.com>; leahlax1234 <leahlax1234@aol.com>
Sent: Wed , Jan 1, 2014 10:45 am
Subject: Re: i agree with you
You FUCKEN JEWS!!!!!! ALL OF YOU . DICK FARREL JOSH COHEN, LEAH LAX AKA LORETTA LAX MILLER AND THE REST OF YOU FUCKEN 30 JEWS. Hitler was right! Ya'll deserve to die! YOU SHOULD BE PLACED IN A BIG OVEN.
Warmly,
JW Grenadier
We hope that you join us on Friday, January 10th, 2014 outside of Janice Wolk Grenadier's house to protest her anti-American pro-Satan values. Email us at muggycatscreams@aol.com for Janice Wolk Grenadier's address. We are expecting at least 200 people so don't forget to bring Holy Water from your church to purify and sactify the land of the supporter of the Anti Christ and the mother of the vessel of Satan. We will have a prayer session to pray for her lack of soul but do not look her straight in the eyes or you will be turned to stone.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to
TwitterShare to
Facebook Labels: CIA, FBI, Hillary Rodman Clinton, Janice Wolk Grenadier, KGB, leah lax, MI5, MI6, My
Pillow Pack, Obama, virginia law 2010
That the above is just 3 pages out of
almost 200 printed out pages of slander and Libel of Plaintiff by
Defendants. Plaintiff felt the e-mails that bear
her name THAT PLAINTIFF DID NOT WRITE
should hold a lot of wait in what Plaintiff will be able to prove.
C.
That an injunction would
not substantially injure other interested parties and This blog has hurt no
one but Plaintiff and her ability to market and advertise a Child Friendly
product. This blog and other actions
were deliberate willful
acts that are and were malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or
grossly reckless. That the hacking and
killing of Plaintiff’s computers was malicious and has also prevented Plaintiff
the right to market her product.
D.
That the public interest would be furthered by the
injunction – the HATE CRIME OF THIS is sinful and that this court cannot see
that becomes questionable to the rational of fairness. That the sexual and in appropriate photos of Hillary Clinton and
Michele Obama in there blogs – The racist and religious overtures of HATE BY
DEFENDENTS is so obvious that to have to
go any further would show Bias by this
court and any one of normal moral value.
. “Fairness of course requires an absence of actual bias in the trial of
cases. But our system of law has always endeavored to prevent even the
probability of unfairness. “In re Murchinson, 349 U.S. 133, 136
(1955)” Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967) was a landmark civil
rights decision
of the United States Supreme Court against
discrimination. Which includes being discriminated because the Judge’s,
lawyers, elected officials and government employees have decided you are not a
part of or one of them.
Claim 6
Common
Law Fraud12 U.S.C 1972
31. Plaintiff
incorporates herein by reference all of the allegations contained in
Paragraphs
1 through 31 of this Complaint.
32. On several
occasions Plaintiff asked the courts to
review and asked for a Special Grand Jury to look into the allocations of
misconduct. Plaintiff was to go in front
of the Grand Jury with her witness’s – But, instead was kidnapped in a
different Court Room and Grand Jury was dismissed prior to her being allowed
into ask for the Special Grand Jury..
Claim 7
Negligence
– the negligent infliction of emotional distress; the intentional infliction of
emotional distress
33. Plaintiff
incorporates herein by reference all of the allegations contained in
Paragraphs
1 through 34 of this Complaint
34. The
defendant’s had a legal duty to use reasonable care in statements posted on the
internet about Plaintiff. They did not
do this. They have posted several lies
about Plaintiff and others. They have
done ruined Plaintiff reputation and should be held financially and legally
responsible for their actions.
35. The
defendant’s malicious actions caused great emotional distress to Plaintiff. By the Commonwealth Attorneys orders of the
City of Alexandria police to never take a complaint from Plaintiff? Plaintiff has been harmed by the false
statements which are considered defamatory – that Plaintiff has “ THE TRUTH”
which is an absolute defense .
That the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution was designed to
protect Freedom of the press. The 1964
case New York Times Co. v. Sullivan radically changed the nature of libel law
by establishing a suit for libel you needed to prove that the information was
wholly and patently false or that it was published “with reckless disregard of
whether it was false or not”. Plaintiff
has been put into an unfair and dangerous position to protect herself and her
girls.
36.
The actions of the actors to cause this emotional
distress were malicious, violent,
oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or grossly reckless.
Claim 8
Constructive
Fraud
37. Plaintiff
incorporates herein by reference all of the allegations contained in
Paragraphs
1 through 37 of this Complaint
38. The defendants
were deceptive
of material misrepresentations of past and existing facts and remained silent
when a duty to speak existed.
39. The
defendant’s actions were Arbitrary and Capricious absence of a rational
connection between the facts found and the choice’s made, made choices that
were not in accordance with the law.
Claim 9
Civil
Conspiracy
40. Plaintiff
incorporates herein by reference all of the allegations contained in
Paragraphs
1 through 40 of this Complaint
41.
The Collusion of the Defendants actions show
collusion to harm Plaintiff from and was done with malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or grossly reckless
intentions.
42. Defendants Civil Conspiracy to Commit Tortious Interference with
Contractual Relations abuse of process, intentional infliction of emotional
distress,
43. Civil conspiracy to commit injurious falsehood with
jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com that
Plaintiff has a “protected characteristic” which will be proven as to why Plaintiff was sought out by
Defendant and that factor is why Plaintiff was targeted by Defendants
44. Defendants were in collusion of civil conspiracy to intentionally
inflict emotional distress.
Claim 10
The Four Basic Freedoms Guaranteed by the
Bill of Rights
45. Plaintiff
incorporates herein by reference all of the allegations contained in
Paragraphs 1 through 45 of this Complaint
46. Plaintiff will prove a violation of
Plaintiffs Bill of Rights the
Four Basic freedoms are being Violated
-
The Four
Freedoms
Plaintiff will show the actions of the
Defendants were actions that were willful acts were malicious, violent,
oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or grossly reckless That the defendants were acting under the
color of State and Federal law. That the Constitutional Rights of due process
are factual allegations that will be proven through documents, letters, e-mails
and actions of defendants. That defends
had been given notice, and this court is aware of with the threat from
Defendant Ilona’s attorney. That
Defendants never filed a response, in regard to the Restraining Order and Injunction. Defendants were notified on or around January
22, 2014 and Order was not written until January 31, 2014 with NOT ONE Defendant responding or disputing Plaintiff’s facts.
47. Plaintiff incorporates information filed in
this court:
January 23, 2014 Emergency Restraining Order w/FEC Complaint
January
24, 2014 Verifyed Compliant - to be
amended
January
24, 2014 Request for Emergency restraining Order and Injection with other
Evidence
January
31, 2014 2nd Request for
Emergency Restraining Order and
Injunction with Other Evidence
February
2, 2014 3rd request for Emergency Restraining Order and Injection
with Other Evidence and to go in front of a Judge.
February
3, 2014 Motion to be heard by a Judge
February
6, 2014 4th Request for EMERGENCY RESTRAINING ORDER and
INJUNCTION WITH OTHER EVIDENCE and to be heard by a Judge “The appearance of
Justice is as Important as Justice itself”
February 10, 2014 EMERGENCY RECONDIDERATION OF ORDER Jan 31,
2014
5th Request from
Plaintiff to be heard by a Judge to explain VERY complicated Situation of
Request for Emergency Restraining Order and Injunctions
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests that this Court:
A.
All
actions requested in the Emergency Restraining Order and Injunction
B. The
right to go in front of a Federal Grand Jury with her witnesses and ask for a
special Grand Jury to look into the Virginia Judicial System.
C. Enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff
and against Defendants, jointly and severally in their official and personal
capacities;
D. Enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff
for the $5 Million + that Defendant Ilona manipulated and stole from Plaintiff.
E. Enter an order declaring Defendants’
conduct unconstitutional;
F. Enter an order declaring Defendants’
conduct negligent;
G. Award Plaintiff compensatory, punitive,
exemplary damages against Defendants;
H. Award Plaintiff if joined with counsel reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs;
I. Enter a permanent injunction requiring
Defendants to remove all information that has been put on the internet by
Defendants that is fraudulent, disingenuous, libel and deformation of Plaintiff
Character.
J. Grant to Plaintiff such other and
further relief as this Honorable Court may deem just and proper under the
circumstances, including but not limited to appropriate injunctive relief.
JURY
TRIAL
Plaintiff demands a jury trial,
pursuant to the Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Date: February 17, 2014 Respectfully submitted,
/S/_____________________________
Janice
Wolk Grenadier
15
West Spring Street
Alexandria,
Virginia 22301
Telephone (202) 368-7178
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF
COLUMBIA
JANICE WOLK GRENADIER
Pro se
15 West Spring Street
Alexandria, Virginia 22301
jwgrenadier@gmail.com
202-368-7178
Plaintiff
v. Civil
Action No. 14-162
ILIONA GRENADIER
HECKMAN Certificate of Service
For Certified Complaint
4200 Massachusetts Ave Apt
410
Washington DC 20016-4752
703-683-9000
GRENADEIR ANDERSON STRARACE DUFFETT & KEISLER, PC
649 S. Washington Street
Alexandria, VA 22314
703-683-9000
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Mark Herring
Office of the Attorney General
900 East Main Street
Richmond, VA 23219
900 East Main Street
Richmond, VA 23219
LORETTA LAX MILLER –aka- LEAH LAX –aka-
MUGGY CAT –aka- BILLY SULLIVAN
Presidential Candidate for 2016
Campaign Headquarters
350 Market Street
Highspire, PA 17304
Highspire, PA 17304
CAMPAIGN FOR LORETTA LAX MILLER
And all employees/volunteers
350 Market Street
Highspire, PA 17304
DEFENDANTS -
Jointly and Severally,
in their Official and Personal Capacities.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Where is Plaintiff on February 17, 2014 Amend Verified
Complaint. That Service to the following
Defendants will be done through e-mail to the above known address of defendants until
other service is required by law.
Date: February 17, 2014 Respectfully submitted,
/S/_____________________________
Janice
Wolk Grenadier
15 West Spring Street
Alexandria, Virginia 22301
Telephone
(202) 368-7178
Email jwgrenadier@gmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment